KVM.la – 45元 256M 15G 35G KVM Windows 佛利蒙(附详细测评)

KVM.LAKVM.la是一家国人VPS服务商,今天在QQ上收到消息,KVM.la新上线了佛利蒙Fremont)的机器,并且终于推出了符合他域名的KVM套餐(基于KVM技术构架的VPS),256M内存,15G硬盘,350G流量,基于KVM构架,支持Linux和Windows(Win 2003,Win 2008,令人瞠目的居然还有深度PE…),月付仅需45元。微魔好像也好久没写测评类的文章了(各种IDC不给力啊,不给测评的VPS…),所以这里再顺便和大家简单分享一下自己的一些测评数据(对KVM安装系统不熟悉的同学点这里充电~)。

KVM.la – 45元 256M 15G 35G KVM Windows 佛利蒙

  • 256MB独立内存
  • 15GB硬盘(RAID10)
  • 350G流量/月
  • KVM构架
  • Windows/Linux
  • 测试ip:184.105.153.88

购买链接

测评内容

本次测评在Debian 6下进行,测试结果即代表当时情况。

初始安装完Debian 6的内存使用情况

root@VMVPS:~# free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:           247         34        213          0          2         17
-/+ buffers/cache:         14        233
Swap:          483          0        483

硬件概况

# Aspersa System Summary Report ##############################
Date | 2012-01-27 07:36:26 UTC (local TZ: CST -0600)
Hostname | VMVPS
Uptime | 5 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
System | Red Hat; KVM; vNot Specified (Other)
Service Tag | Not Specified
Platform | Linux
Release | Debian-based version 6.0.2 (squeeze)
Kernel | 2.6.32-5-686
Architecture | CPU = 64-bit, OS = 32-bit
Threading | NPTL 2.11.2
Compiler | GNU CC version 4.4.5.
SELinux | No SELinux detected
Virtualized | QEmu
# Processor ##################################################
Processors | physical = 2, cores = 0, virtual = 2, hyperthreading = no
Speeds | 2x3192.912
Models | 2xQEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1
Caches | 2x32 KB
# Memory #####################################################
Total | 247.98M
Free | 210.82M
Used | physical = 37.15M, swap = 0.00k, virtual = 37.15M
Buffers | 2.18M
Caches | 19.64M
Dirty | 100 kB
UsedRSS | 20.5M
Swappiness | vm.swappiness = 60
DirtyPolicy | vm.dirty_ratio = 20, vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
DirtyStatus | vm.dirty_bytes = 0, vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
Locator Size Speed Form Factor Type Type Detail
========= ======== ================= ============= ============= ===========
DIMM 0 256 MB DIMM RAM None
# Mounted Filesystems ########################################
Filesystem Size Used Type Opts Mountpoint
/dev/sda1 15G 5% ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro /
tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev /dev/shm
tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 /dev/shm
tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev /lib/init/rw
tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 /lib/init/rw
udev 120M 1% tmpfs rw,mode=0755 /dev
# Disk Schedulers And Queue Size #############################
sda | [cfq] 128
sr0 | [cfq] 128
# Disk Partioning ############################################
Device Type Start End Size
============ ==== ========== ========== ==================
/dev/sda Disk 16106127360
/dev/sda1 Part 1 1897 15595130880
/dev/sda2 Part 1897 1958 501742080
/dev/sda5 Part 1897 1958 501742080
/dev/sr0 Disk 679477248
/dev/sr0p1 Part 1 648 2713714688
# Kernel Inode State #########################################
dentry-state | 6319 4616 45 0 0 0
file-nr | 256 0 24441
inode-nr | 4471 89
# LVM Volumes ################################################
Cannot execute 'lvs'
# RAID Controller ############################################
Controller | No RAID controller detected
# Network Config #############################################
Controller | Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 20)
FIN Timeout | net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 60
Port Range | net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 32768 61000
# Interface Statistics #######################################
interface rx_bytes rx_packets rx_errors tx_bytes tx_packets tx_errors
========= ========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
l 600 8 0 600 8 0
eth 3500000 60000 0 15000 125 0
# Network Connections ########################################
Connections from remote IP addresses
74.125.127.8 1
112.81.121.10 1
Connections to local IP addresses
64.62.209.16 2
Connections to top 10 local ports
22 1
55339 1
States of connections
ESTABLISHED 1
LISTEN 6
TIME_WAIT 1
# Top Processes ##############################################
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 20 0 2032 708 612 S 0 0.3 0:00.60 init
2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd
3 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0
4 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0
5 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0
6 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/1
7 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1
8 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1
9 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 events/0
# Simplified and fuzzy rounded vmstat (wait please) ##########
procs ---swap-- -----io---- ---system---- --------cpu--------
r b si so bi bo ir cs us sy il wa st
0 0 0 0 40 3 100 25 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 200 15 0 1 99 0
0 0 0 0 0 250 225 25 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 200 10 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 225 8 0 0 100 0
# The End ####################################################

CPU信息

processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 6
model name	: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1
stepping	: 3
cpu MHz		: 3192.912
cache size	: 32 KB
fdiv_bug	: no
hlt_bug		: no
f00f_bug	: no
coma_bug	: no
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 4
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni hypervisor
bogomips	: 6385.82
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 6
model name	: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1
stepping	: 3
cpu MHz		: 3192.912
cache size	: 32 KB
fdiv_bug	: no
hlt_bug		: no
f00f_bug	: no
coma_bug	: no
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 4
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni hypervisor
bogomips	: 6385.82
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

内存信息

MemTotal:         253928 kB
MemFree:            3704 kB
Buffers:           27628 kB
Cached:           204192 kB
SwapCached:            0 kB
Active:            16692 kB
Inactive:         220528 kB
Active(anon):       2600 kB
Inactive(anon):     2916 kB
Active(file):      14092 kB
Inactive(file):   217612 kB
Unevictable:           0 kB
Mlocked:               0 kB
HighTotal:             0 kB
HighFree:              0 kB
LowTotal:         253928 kB
LowFree:            3704 kB
SwapTotal:        495608 kB
SwapFree:         495608 kB
Dirty:                 0 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:          5400 kB
Mapped:             4252 kB
Shmem:               116 kB
Slab:               9704 kB
SReclaimable:       5920 kB
SUnreclaim:         3784 kB
KernelStack:         552 kB
PageTables:          372 kB
NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
Bounce:                0 kB
WritebackTmp:          0 kB
CommitLimit:      622572 kB
Committed_AS:      38260 kB
VmallocTotal:     766008 kB
VmallocUsed:        5616 kB
VmallocChunk:     752836 kB
HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
HugePages_Total:       0
HugePages_Free:        0
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       4096 kB
DirectMap4k:       12224 kB
DirectMap4M:      249856 kB

硬盘测试

root@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.5833 s, 48.1 MB/s
root@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.31768 s, 50.5 MB/s
root@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.1846 s, 51.8 MB/s

网络测试

wget测试

--2012-01-27 05:43:30--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: 100mb.test?

100%[===========================================================>] 104,857,600 11.1M/s   in 9.3s    

2012-01-27 05:43:39 (10.8 MB/s) - 100mb.test?.saved [104857600/104857600]

 

全国Ping值测试

序号 Ping的地点 响应IP 响应时间 TTL
1 襄阳[电信] 184.105.153.88 262毫秒 53
2 南宁[电信] 184.105.153.88 181毫秒 51
3 厦门[电信] 184.105.153.88 281毫秒 52
4 美国[国外] 184.105.153.88 5毫秒 60
5 山东[联通] 184.105.153.88 211毫秒 52
6 泉州[电信] 184.105.153.88 273毫秒 52
7 福州[电信] 184.105.153.88 276毫秒 53
8 宁波[电信] 184.105.153.88 253毫秒 52
9 合肥[电信] 184.105.153.88 273毫秒 51
10 丽水[电信] 184.105.153.88 252毫秒 52
11 商丘[联通] 184.105.153.88 204毫秒 51
12 安徽[移动] 184.105.153.88 193毫秒 47
13 绵阳[电信] 184.105.153.88 279毫秒 53
14 重庆[联通] 184.105.153.88 242毫秒 52
15 杭州[电信] 184.105.153.88 270毫秒 51
16 东莞[电信] 184.105.153.88 169毫秒 51
17 天津[联通] 184.105.153.88 204毫秒 52
18 郑州[联通] 184.105.153.88 221毫秒 50
19 上海[移动] 184.105.153.88 186毫秒 47
20 浙江[移动] 184.105.153.88 191毫秒 48
21 泉州[移动] 184.105.153.88 192毫秒 50
22 辽宁[联通] 184.105.153.88 214毫秒 52
23 益阳[电信] 184.105.153.88 167毫秒 52
24 浙江[移动] 184.105.153.88 192毫秒 48
25 福建[移动] 184.105.153.88 206毫秒 48

最快:美国[国外] 5 毫秒 最慢:厦门[电信] 281 毫秒
电信平均: 244 毫秒 联通平均: 216 毫秒

UnixBench跑分测试

   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

   Version 5.1.2                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA
   December 22, 2007                  johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

2 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Process Creation  1 2 3

2 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: VMVPS: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 11 12:29:30 UTC 2012
   Machine: i686 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6385.8 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6385.8 bogomips)
          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   01:59:30 up 28 min,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 27 2012 01:59:30 - 02:27:41
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       19964550.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3263.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2405.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        954374.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          249760.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2294195.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2311212.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 411911.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6720.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6983.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2097.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        3667232.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   19964550.8   1710.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3263.7    593.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2405.9    559.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     954374.9   2410.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     249760.9   1509.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2294195.6   3955.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2311212.1   1857.9
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     411911.0   1029.8
Process Creation                                126.0       6720.0    533.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6983.9   1647.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2097.6   3496.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    3667232.0   2444.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1487.5

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 27 2012 02:27:41 - 02:55:54
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       40026791.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     6510.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                              12281.1 lps   (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1051261.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          278659.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3146686.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             4477483.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 786097.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              43548.3 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  16441.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   2139.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        5959239.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   40026791.6   3429.9
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       6510.0   1183.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0      12281.1   2856.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1051261.9   2654.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     278659.4   1683.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3146686.2   5425.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    4477483.5   3599.3
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     786097.9   1965.2
Process Creation                                126.0      43548.3   3456.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      16441.4   3877.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       2139.4   3565.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    5959239.7   3972.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2915.8

测试结论

KVM.la本次推出的KVM套餐整体的测评结果还是符合人们(至少是我自己~)期盼的,更为关键是在遭到诸多国人VPS服务商弃用的KVM技术终于又回到了大家的视野,这对于许多技术控应该是个不小的福音~

猜你 喜欢

关于作者: 微魔

小微魔,大智慧!

多条评论

      1. 嗯,是的,我那个DD结果比你的稍微好点,不过我的IP和你的隔很多呀
        对了,刚才你的网站有一段时间打不开

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。