KVM.la是一家国人VPS服务商，今天在QQ上收到消息，KVM.la新上线了佛利蒙（Fremont）的机器，并且终于推出了符合他域名的KVM套餐（基于KVM技术构架的VPS），256M内存，15G硬盘，350G流量，基于KVM构架，支持Linux和Windows（Win 2003，Win 2008，令人瞠目的居然还有深度PE…），月付仅需45元。微魔好像也好久没写测评类的文章了（各种IDC不给力啊，不给测评的VPS…），所以这里再顺便和大家简单分享一下自己的一些测评数据（对KVM安装系统不熟悉的同学点这里充电~）。
KVM.la – 45元 256M 15G 35G KVM Windows 佛利蒙
- 256MB独立内存
- 15GB硬盘（RAID10）
- 350G流量/月
- KVM构架
- Windows/Linux
- 测试ip：184.105.153.88
测评内容
本次测评在Debian 6下进行，测试结果即代表当时情况。
初始安装完Debian 6的内存使用情况
root@VMVPS:~# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 247 34 213 0 2 17
-/+ buffers/cache: 14 233
Swap: 483 0 483
硬件概况
# Aspersa System Summary Report ############################## Date | 2012-01-27 07:36:26 UTC (local TZ: CST -0600) Hostname | VMVPS Uptime | 5 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 System | Red Hat; KVM; vNot Specified (Other) Service Tag | Not Specified Platform | Linux Release | Debian-based version 6.0.2 (squeeze) Kernel | 2.6.32-5-686 Architecture | CPU = 64-bit, OS = 32-bit Threading | NPTL 2.11.2 Compiler | GNU CC version 4.4.5. SELinux | No SELinux detected Virtualized | QEmu # Processor ################################################## Processors | physical = 2, cores = 0, virtual = 2, hyperthreading = no Speeds | 2x3192.912 Models | 2xQEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 Caches | 2x32 KB # Memory ##################################################### Total | 247.98M Free | 210.82M Used | physical = 37.15M, swap = 0.00k, virtual = 37.15M Buffers | 2.18M Caches | 19.64M Dirty | 100 kB UsedRSS | 20.5M Swappiness | vm.swappiness = 60 DirtyPolicy | vm.dirty_ratio = 20, vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10 DirtyStatus | vm.dirty_bytes = 0, vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0 Locator Size Speed Form Factor Type Type Detail ========= ======== ================= ============= ============= =========== DIMM 0 256 MB DIMM RAM None # Mounted Filesystems ######################################## Filesystem Size Used Type Opts Mountpoint /dev/sda1 15G 5% ext3 rw,errors=remount-ro / tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev /dev/shm tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 /dev/shm tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev /lib/init/rw tmpfs 124M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,mode=0755 /lib/init/rw udev 120M 1% tmpfs rw,mode=0755 /dev # Disk Schedulers And Queue Size ############################# sda | [cfq] 128 sr0 | [cfq] 128 # Disk Partioning ############################################ Device Type Start End Size ============ ==== ========== ========== ================== /dev/sda Disk 16106127360 /dev/sda1 Part 1 1897 15595130880 /dev/sda2 Part 1897 1958 501742080 /dev/sda5 Part 1897 1958 501742080 /dev/sr0 Disk 679477248 /dev/sr0p1 Part 1 648 2713714688 # Kernel Inode State ######################################### dentry-state | 6319 4616 45 0 0 0 file-nr | 256 0 24441 inode-nr | 4471 89 # LVM Volumes ################################################ Cannot execute 'lvs' # RAID Controller ############################################ Controller | No RAID controller detected # Network Config ############################################# Controller | Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 20) FIN Timeout | net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 60 Port Range | net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 32768 61000 # Interface Statistics ####################################### interface rx_bytes rx_packets rx_errors tx_bytes tx_packets tx_errors ========= ========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ========== l 600 8 0 600 8 0 eth 3500000 60000 0 15000 125 0 # Network Connections ######################################## Connections from remote IP addresses 74.125.127.8 1 112.81.121.10 1 Connections to local IP addresses 64.62.209.16 2 Connections to top 10 local ports 22 1 55339 1 States of connections ESTABLISHED 1 LISTEN 6 TIME_WAIT 1 # Top Processes ############################################## PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1 root 20 0 2032 708 612 S 0 0.3 0:00.60 init 2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd 3 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/0 4 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0 5 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0 6 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/1 7 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1 8 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1 9 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 events/0 # Simplified and fuzzy rounded vmstat (wait please) ########## procs ---swap-- -----io---- ---system---- --------cpu-------- r b si so bi bo ir cs us sy il wa st 0 0 0 0 40 3 100 25 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 15 0 1 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 250 225 25 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200 10 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 225 8 0 0 100 0 # The End ####################################################
CPU信息
processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 6 model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 3192.912 cache size : 32 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 4 wp : yes flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni hypervisor bogomips : 6385.82 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: processor : 1 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 6 model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 stepping : 3 cpu MHz : 3192.912 cache size : 32 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 4 wp : yes flags : fpu de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm pni hypervisor bogomips : 6385.82 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
内存信息
MemTotal: 253928 kB MemFree: 3704 kB Buffers: 27628 kB Cached: 204192 kB SwapCached: 0 kB Active: 16692 kB Inactive: 220528 kB Active(anon): 2600 kB Inactive(anon): 2916 kB Active(file): 14092 kB Inactive(file): 217612 kB Unevictable: 0 kB Mlocked: 0 kB HighTotal: 0 kB HighFree: 0 kB LowTotal: 253928 kB LowFree: 3704 kB SwapTotal: 495608 kB SwapFree: 495608 kB Dirty: 0 kB Writeback: 0 kB AnonPages: 5400 kB Mapped: 4252 kB Shmem: 116 kB Slab: 9704 kB SReclaimable: 5920 kB SUnreclaim: 3784 kB KernelStack: 552 kB PageTables: 372 kB NFS_Unstable: 0 kB Bounce: 0 kB WritebackTmp: 0 kB CommitLimit: 622572 kB Committed_AS: 38260 kB VmallocTotal: 766008 kB VmallocUsed: 5616 kB VmallocChunk: 752836 kB HardwareCorrupted: 0 kB HugePages_Total: 0 HugePages_Free: 0 HugePages_Rsvd: 0 HugePages_Surp: 0 Hugepagesize: 4096 kB DirectMap4k: 12224 kB DirectMap4M: 249856 kB
硬盘测试
root@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.5833 s, 48.1 MB/s root@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.31768 s, 50.5 MB/s root@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.1846 s, 51.8 MB/s
网络测试
wget测试
--2012-01-27 05:43:30-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: 100mb.test? 100%[===========================================================>] 104,857,600 11.1M/s in 9.3s 2012-01-27 05:43:39 (10.8 MB/s) - 100mb.test?.saved [104857600/104857600]
全国Ping值测试
| 序号 | Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
| 1 | 襄阳[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 262毫秒 | 53 |
| 2 | 南宁[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 181毫秒 | 51 |
| 3 | 厦门[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 281毫秒 | 52 |
| 4 | 美国[国外] | 184.105.153.88 | 5毫秒 | 60 |
| 5 | 山东[联通] | 184.105.153.88 | 211毫秒 | 52 |
| 6 | 泉州[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 273毫秒 | 52 |
| 7 | 福州[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 276毫秒 | 53 |
| 8 | 宁波[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 253毫秒 | 52 |
| 9 | 合肥[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 273毫秒 | 51 |
| 10 | 丽水[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 252毫秒 | 52 |
| 11 | 商丘[联通] | 184.105.153.88 | 204毫秒 | 51 |
| 12 | 安徽[移动] | 184.105.153.88 | 193毫秒 | 47 |
| 13 | 绵阳[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 279毫秒 | 53 |
| 14 | 重庆[联通] | 184.105.153.88 | 242毫秒 | 52 |
| 15 | 杭州[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 270毫秒 | 51 |
| 16 | 东莞[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 169毫秒 | 51 |
| 17 | 天津[联通] | 184.105.153.88 | 204毫秒 | 52 |
| 18 | 郑州[联通] | 184.105.153.88 | 221毫秒 | 50 |
| 19 | 上海[移动] | 184.105.153.88 | 186毫秒 | 47 |
| 20 | 浙江[移动] | 184.105.153.88 | 191毫秒 | 48 |
| 21 | 泉州[移动] | 184.105.153.88 | 192毫秒 | 50 |
| 22 | 辽宁[联通] | 184.105.153.88 | 214毫秒 | 52 |
| 23 | 益阳[电信] | 184.105.153.88 | 167毫秒 | 52 |
| 24 | 浙江[移动] | 184.105.153.88 | 192毫秒 | 48 |
| 25 | 福建[移动] | 184.105.153.88 | 206毫秒 | 48 |
最快：美国[国外] 5 毫秒 最慢：厦门[电信] 281 毫秒
电信平均： 244 毫秒 联通平均： 216 毫秒
UnixBench跑分测试
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
2 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Process Creation 1 2 3
2 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
2 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: VMVPS: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686 -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 11 12:29:30 UTC 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6385.8 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.9.1 (6385.8 bogomips)
x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
01:59:30 up 28 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 27 2012 01:59:30 - 02:27:41
2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19964550.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3263.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 2405.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 954374.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 249760.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2294195.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2311212.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 411911.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 6720.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6983.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2097.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3667232.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19964550.8 1710.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3263.7 593.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 2405.9 559.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 954374.9 2410.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 249760.9 1509.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2294195.6 3955.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2311212.1 1857.9
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 411911.0 1029.8
Process Creation 126.0 6720.0 533.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6983.9 1647.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2097.6 3496.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3667232.0 2444.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1487.5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Jan 27 2012 02:27:41 - 02:55:54
2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 40026791.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 6510.0 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 12281.1 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1051261.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 278659.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3146686.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4477483.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 786097.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 43548.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 16441.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2139.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 5959239.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 40026791.6 3429.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 6510.0 1183.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 12281.1 2856.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1051261.9 2654.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 278659.4 1683.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3146686.2 5425.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4477483.5 3599.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 786097.9 1965.2
Process Creation 126.0 43548.3 3456.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 16441.4 3877.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2139.4 3565.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 5959239.7 3972.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2915.8
测试结论
KVM.la本次推出的KVM套餐整体的测评结果还是符合人们（至少是我自己~）期盼的，更为关键是在遭到诸多国人VPS服务商弃用的KVM技术终于又回到了大家的视野，这对于许多技术控应该是个不小的福音~
你这个跑分好高哦
我感觉这个数据啊还是分时段的，特别是KVM，要是赶上大家一起折腾到的时候就会闹心了~
嗯，是的，我那个DD结果比你的稍微好点，不过我的IP和你的隔很多呀
对了，刚才你的网站有一段时间打不开
嗯，我注意到了，联通线路都挂了…不过还好只抽了一会儿~