RaxWeb在2月底就给微魔开了一台1G的测试VPS，一直没时间写测评文章，今天给大家发出来吧。这家采用的账务系统是HostBill，VPS管理采用的是SolusVM（面板直接集成在HostBill），另外每个客户还可以得到免费的DNS（共4组，三个美国，一个英国）。多余的就不多介绍了，急着看结果的直接传送~
RaxWeb – 7美元 1G 70G 600G OpenVZ 新泽西
本次测试系Debian 6.0 32位系统下进行
测试内容：
1.产品配置及测试环境
- 1GB内存/2GB突发
- 70GB硬盘 @ RAID 10
- 600GB流量
- SolusVM/OpenVZ
本文订购链接纯天然绿色，无毒无副作用，不含AFF等佣金或中介推广费用，可放心选择~
# uptime 10:49:43 up 16 days, 18:06, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
2月21日开的VPS，截止到3月10日，目前连续在线16天了，在线率不错。
2.网络测试
Ping值测试
以下使用的是订购得到的真实ip（为保护商家权益末两位隐去），测试时间为北京时间2013年3月10日 15:10，仅代表当时情况
| 序号 | Ping的地点 | 响应IP | 响应时间 | TTL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 陕西西安[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 351毫秒 | 50 |
| 2 | 云南昆明[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 284毫秒 | 51 |
| 3 | 四川德阳[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 261毫秒 | 48 |
| 4 | 江苏无锡[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 213毫秒 | 48 |
| 5 | 香港[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 240毫秒 | 53 |
| 6 | 广东东莞[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 254毫秒 | 49 |
| 7 | 上海[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 222毫秒 | 50 |
| 8 | 江苏镇江[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 355毫秒 | 49 |
| 9 | 四川绵阳[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 298毫秒 | 51 |
| 10 | 四川遂宁[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 286毫秒 | 51 |
| 11 | 安徽淮北[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 319毫秒 | 50 |
| 12 | 江西[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 337毫秒 | 50 |
| 13 | 江苏扬州[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 240毫秒 | 49 |
| 14 | 深圳[电信] | 108.61.x.x | 262毫秒 | 49 |
| 15 | 河南郑州[多线] | 108.61.x.x | 436毫秒 | 48 |
| 16 | 上海[多线] | 108.61.x.x | 381毫秒 | 44 |
| 17 | 北京[多线] | 108.61.x.x | 453毫秒 | 38 |
| 18 | 辽宁[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 超时 | — |
| 19 | 上海[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 327毫秒 | 48 |
| 20 | 宁波[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 282毫秒 | 49 |
| 21 | 深圳[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 594毫秒 | 43 |
| 22 | 江苏[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 296毫秒 | 44 |
| 23 | 安徽滁州[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 284毫秒 | 43 |
| 24 | 北京[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 223毫秒 | 42 |
| 25 | 厦门[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 405毫秒 | 45 |
| 26 | 天津[联通] | 108.61.x.x | 318毫秒 | 40 |
| 27 | 江苏[移动] | 108.61.x.x | 282毫秒 | 41 |
| 28 | 山东[移动] | 108.61.x.x | 282毫秒 | 41 |
| 29 | 福建厦门[移动] | 108.61.x.x | 291毫秒 | 42 |
| 30 | 深圳[移动] | 108.61.x.x | 279毫秒 | 44 |
| 31 | 上海[移动] | 108.61.x.x | 273毫秒 | 44 |
| 32 | 美国迈阿密[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 65毫秒 | 54 |
| 33 | 台湾[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 234毫秒 | 47 |
| 34 | 新加坡[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 253毫秒 | 56 |
| 35 | 加拿大[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 9毫秒 | 58 |
| 36 | 美国堪萨斯[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 29毫秒 | 54 |
| 37 | 美国圣安娜[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 85毫秒 | 56 |
| 38 | 美国洛杉矶[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 61毫秒 | 55 |
| 39 | 香港[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 268毫秒 | 47 |
| 40 | 德国[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 87毫秒 | 57 |
| 41 | 英国[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 67毫秒 | 56 |
| 42 | 日本[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 183毫秒 | 51 |
| 43 | 美国圣何塞[海外] | 108.61.x.x | 145毫秒 | 56 |
最快：加拿大[海外] 9 毫秒 最慢：深圳[联通] 594 毫秒
电信平均： 280 毫秒 联通平均： 341 毫秒
武汉电信TraceRT测试
通过最多 30 个跃点跟踪 到 hosted.at.raxweb.com [108.61.x.x] 的路由: 1 <1 毫秒 * <1 毫秒 x.x.x.x 2 1 ms * <1 毫秒 10.81.96.6 3 2 ms * 1 ms 58.48.110.225 4 4 ms * 4 ms 111.175.224.25 5 1 ms * 1 ms 111.175.225.109 6 18 ms * 18 ms 202.97.34.161 7 20 ms * 19 ms 202.97.53.106 8 18 ms * 18 ms 202.97.53.250 9 279 ms 285 ms 279 ms 202.97.51.94 10 235 ms 237 ms 235 ms 202.97.49.197 11 238 ms 246 ms 207 ms po1-4003.bagse1.Bagnolet.opentransit.net [193.25 1.249.189] 12 316 ms 344 ms 342 ms tengige0-13-4-0.nyktr1.NewYork.opentransit.net [ 193.251.128.25] 13 305 ms 327 ms 277 ms choopa-1.GW.opentransit.net [193.251.255.186] 14 330 ms 321 ms 279 ms ve67-br1.pnj1.choopa.net [108.61.93.109] 15 320 ms 330 ms 290 ms 108.61.30.50.choopa.net [108.61.30.50] 16 296 ms 311 ms 270 ms hosted.at.raxweb.com [64.237.43.114] 17 311 ms 334 ms 329 ms hosted.at.raxweb.com [108.61.x.x] 跟踪完成。
wget测速
命令行：
wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
结果如下，
--2013-03-10 10:53:21-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175 Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: `100mb.test' 100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 36.8M/s in 2.7s 2013-03-10 10:53:24 (36.8 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
1Gbps的网口。
3.硬件测试
硬件概况
采用命令行：
wget http://aspersa.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/summary
chmod a+x summary
./summary
输出结果如下：
# Aspersa System Summary Report ##############################
Date | 2013-03-10 14:56:09 UTC (local TZ: EDT -0400)
Hostname | vmvps
Uptime | 16 days, 18:13, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Platform | Linux
Release | Debian GNU/Linux 6.0.6 (squeeze) (squeeze)
Kernel | 2.6.32-042stab072.10
Architecture | CPU = 64-bit, OS = 32-bit
Threading | NPTL 2.11.3
Compiler | GNU CC version 4.4.5.
SELinux | No SELinux detected
Virtualized | No virtualization detected
# Processor ##################################################
Processors | physical = 1, cores = 4, virtual = 4, hyperthreading = no
Speeds | 2x1600.000, 1x1900.000, 1x3401.000
Models | 4xIntel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz
Caches | 4x8192 KB
# Memory #####################################################
Total | 1.00G
Free | 881.78M
Used | physical = 142.22M, swap = 0.00k, virtual = 142.22M
Buffers | 0.00k
Caches | 132.46M
Dirty | 80 kB
UsedRSS | 20.0M
Swappiness | vm.swappiness = 60
DirtyPolicy | vm.dirty_ratio = 20, vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
DirtyStatus | vm.dirty_bytes = 0, vm.dirty_background_bytes = 0
# Mounted Filesystems ########################################
Filesystem Size Used Type Opts Mountpoint
/dev/simfs 70G 1% simfs rw,relatime /
tmpfs 512M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime /dev/shm
tmpfs 512M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,mode=755 /dev/shm
tmpfs 512M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,relatime /lib/init/rw
tmpfs 512M 0% tmpfs rw,nosuid,relatime,mode=755 /lib/init/rw
# Disk Schedulers And Queue Size #############################
ls: cannot access /sys/block/: No such file or directory
# Disk Partioning ############################################
Device Type Start End Size
============ ==== ========== ========== ==================
# Kernel Inode State #########################################
dentry-state | 1175023 1145468 45 0 0 0
file-nr | 1536 0 3267180
inode-nr | 1563889 993254
# LVM Volumes ################################################
Cannot execute 'lvs'
# RAID Controller ############################################
Controller | No RAID controller detected
# Network Config #############################################
FIN Timeout | net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 60
Port Range | net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 32768 61000
# Interface Statistics #######################################
interface rx_bytes rx_packets rx_errors tx_bytes tx_packets tx_errors
========= ========= ========== ========== ========== ========== ==========
lo 20000 300 0 20000 300 0
venet0 125000000 300000 0 45000000 300000 0
# Network Connections ########################################
Connections from remote IP addresses
58.48.110.164 1
2607 1
Connections to local IP addresses
108.61.63.71 1
2001 1
Connections to top 10 local ports
19f0:1624:ed:43248 1
22 1
States of connections
ESTABLISHED 1
LISTEN 5
TIME_WAIT 1
# Top Processes ##############################################
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 20 0 2028 704 608 S 0 0.1 0:08.32 init
2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd/108
3 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper/108
425 root 20 0 1736 616 504 S 0 0.1 0:05.96 syslogd
446 root 20 0 8668 784 452 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 saslauthd
447 root 20 0 8668 380 48 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 saslauthd
462 root 20 0 5140 2748 1444 S 0 0.3 0:22.73 apache2
522 root 20 0 2288 868 680 S 0 0.1 0:01.21 cron
524 root 20 0 2392 848 680 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 xinetd
# Simplified and fuzzy rounded vmstat (wait please) ##########
procs ---swap-- -----io---- ---system---- --------cpu--------
r b si so bi bo ir cs us sy il wa st
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6000 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6000 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6000 0 0 100 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7000 0 0 100 0
# The End ####################################################
CPU info
虽然，在上面的结果中已经包含了CPU的信息，但是这里还是多此一举的看看CPUinfo吧~采用命令：
cat /proc/cpuinfo
输出结果：
processor : 3 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 58 model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz stepping : 9 cpu MHz : 1900.000 cache size : 8192 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 8 core id : 3 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 6 initial apicid : 6 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 13 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms bogomips : 6784.95 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management:
4核CPU
硬盘测试
命令行：
dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
商家对于DD命令似乎做了限制，无法得到该命令结果~
root@VMVPS:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1070.7 s, 251 kB/s
UnixBench跑分
apt-get install gcc libxext-dev libgl1-mesa-dev wget http://byte-unixbench.googlecode.com/files/unixbench-5.1.2.tar.gz tar -zxvf unixbench-5.1.2.tar.gz cd unixbench-5.1.2 make ./Run
运行UnixBench，得分也很不错~
UnixBench输出结果：
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Process Creation 1 2 3
4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)
System: vmvps: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab072.10 -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 16 18:54:05 MSK 2013
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6784.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6784.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6784.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6784.9 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
11:23:16 up 16 days, 18:40, 1 user, load average: 0.60, 0.82, 0.63; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 10 2013 11:23:16 - 11:51:20
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25345296.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3727.0 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3435.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 743128.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 189442.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2005579.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1293324.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 122428.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8864.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4125.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2343.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 979362.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25345296.7 2171.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3727.0 677.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 3435.5 799.0
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 743128.8 1876.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 189442.4 1144.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2005579.3 3457.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1293324.5 1039.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 122428.8 306.1
Process Creation 126.0 8864.3 703.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4125.9 973.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2343.0 3905.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 979362.3 652.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1140.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sun Mar 10 2013 11:51:20 - 12:19:35
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 92167264.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 14165.2 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 27229.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1007914.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 268426.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2973646.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4703556.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 953036.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 69659.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 3568.0 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 206.3 lpm (60.4 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3401837.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 92167264.8 7897.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 14165.2 2575.5
Execl Throughput 43.0 27229.8 6332.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1007914.9 2545.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 268426.4 1621.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2973646.8 5127.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4703556.6 3781.0
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 953036.5 2382.6
Process Creation 126.0 69659.5 5528.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 3568.0 841.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 206.3 343.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3401837.6 2267.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 2585.1
4.测试总结
其实大家在看诸如此类的VPS测评文章里面，很多数据的东西都容易让人眼花缭乱，在微魔看来大家实际上也不必太纠结于这类数据，对于VPS的选择，还是要以真是的使用感受为准。微魔通过对这家的了解，大致上有以下体会和大家分享（包含优点与缺点）：
- 这家的服务比较全面，受益于HostBill对SolusVM和DNS管理系统良好的融合，在HostBill下就可以完成大多数工作（如重装系统等），而对比之下，WHMCS后台好像没有重装的选项，需要跳转到SolusVM；
- 支持ipv6，官方默认开通16个ipv6地址，微魔发现ipv6的支持在很多老外的客户而言似乎非常看重，而这一点，在国内则非常不受重视；
- 在线率不错，连续16天在线虽然不是什么傲人的成绩，但是微魔确实见过很多7-8天一重启的VPS...
- 由于数据中心位于新泽西，对于国内的访问速度很一般，基本都在300ms以上，这个问题见仁见智，大家要是在国外有业务应该是不错的选择；
- 不知道是否是商家有意限制了硬盘的DD命令，本文的DD命令结果未知。
