URPad隶属于FTNHosting，据官方自称，有5年的经验，一直以来价格都不错（传送门）但是今天的价格还是让人震惊！什么时候128M内存的OpenVZ年付价格居然可以低到8美元！另外一款高规格的促销更加给力，768M内存的OpenVZ，年付价格仅需19美元（19美元在很多商家最多只能做到256M）
URPad – 年付8美元 128M 10G 100G OVZ 三机房
- 128MB内存/256MB突发
- 10GB硬盘
- 100GB流量
- OpenVZ/Solusvm
测试ip：洛杉矶QuadraNET – 98.143.159.202；达拉斯Colo4 – 198.12.71.130；芝加哥ColoCrossing – 198.144.179.130
URPad – 年付19美元 768M 40G 750G OVZ 三机房
- 768MB内存/1GB突发
- 40GB硬盘
- 750GB流量
- OpenVZ/Solusvm
顺便送上网友跑分
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Process Creation 1 2 3
4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: ******************
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-042stab065.3 -- #1 SMP Mon Nov 12 21:59:14 MSK 2012
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6800.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6800.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6800.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1240 V2 @ 3.40GHz (6800.3 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
06:13:29 up 11 min, 1 user, load average: 0.04, 0.06, 0.04; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 22 2013 06:13:29 - 06:41:35
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 22862253.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3366.0 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 5769.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 769430.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 208466.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2287950.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1180827.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 185420.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 18438.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 9507.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 2965.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 893772.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 22862253.7 1959.1
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3366.0 612.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 5769.0 1341.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 769430.1 1943.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 208466.7 1259.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2287950.1 3944.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1180827.4 949.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 185420.6 463.6
Process Creation 126.0 18438.5 1463.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 9507.4 2242.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 2965.2 4942.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 893772.0 595.8
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1417.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Jan 22 2013 06:41:35 - 07:09:47
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 76977301.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12958.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 25113.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1240354.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 334581.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3608440.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 4515204.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 971847.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 56927.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 26606.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3556.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 3126326.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 76977301.5 6596.2
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12958.4 2356.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 25113.3 5840.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1240354.5 3132.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 334581.2 2021.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3608440.9 6221.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4515204.3 3629.6
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 971847.1 2429.6
Process Creation 126.0 56927.2 4518.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 26606.1 6275.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3556.7 5927.8
System Call Overhead 15000.0 3126326.4 2084.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 3863.0
🙁 悲剧了买了一个DD硬盘只有1.6M/S擦是不是买到玻璃盘了。。。
🙁 太艹蛋了。。没注意是100G流量。。汗，还打算做图床这下又悲剧了。弄个图片站跑个三四千IP 估计危险不。。微魔法老大。
图片站我也没什么经验，要是跑3-4000的话，全静态也许可以吧，但正如你所说，这个流量跑图片站就吃力了
跑图片站很吃力？指的的是流量？还是速度？我也想做个
有经验。。图片不是高清跑起来没困难。。因为我朋友1K2的IP一个月跑30G的流量。。然后我的很好~~装lnmp总计时长25分钟。。。比多数512M的xen都给力。。。。ping值很爽~电信180左右，联通固定200左右。。。。。
这款vps的速度做图片站没什么问题吧~
。。。速度不是关键。。。关键是性能。。。应该说128的跑太多的流量是有些问题的。。。
做一个图片站的话256不够？
试试看吧。看你的优化程度了。256的抗1K的IP不成问题的。。
才1k，，，，哎，我的目标比较大~~
卖完了
所以以后要惰惰关注微魔部落哟~~~