AlienVPS – 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯/纽约

AlienVPS是一家主打低价年付的VPS的服务商，之前一直主推19美元年付的VPS（他家的配置也喜欢19这个数字），机房在拉斯维加斯和纽约（国内访问速度一般）。最近他家推出了秋季特惠，直降5美元，这样，原价就已经很便宜的19刀年付，仅需14美元。配置不变，依然是190M内存，220M交换，19G硬盘，190G流量。大家可能也注意了，他家的硬盘比较充裕，而流量相对较小，比较适合建站。此外，他家的Xen VPS也推出了年付24美元的特价。此外本文还将简单送上AlienVPS的评测（Ping值测速、纽约机房评测、拉斯维加斯机房评测）

AlienVPS – 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯/纽约

OpenVZ Abduction — $14/year

190MB memory/220MB vswap
19GB storage
190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps
拉斯维加斯, 纽约

Xen Abduction — $24/year

190MB memory/220MB swap
9GB storage
190GB/month data transfer on 25Mbps
拉斯维加斯, 纽约

Warp 1 — $4/month

512MB memory/512MB vswap
20GB storage
500GB/month data transfer on 50Mbps
拉斯维加斯, 纽约

测试ip：
纽约：199.167.194.101
拉斯维加斯：208.93.153.101

Ping值测试

纽约：

Ping的地点	响应IP	响应时间	TTL
襄阳[电信]	199.167.194.101	270毫秒	47
南宁[电信]	199.167.194.101	241毫秒	45
重庆[联通]	199.167.194.101	超时	—
厦门[电信]	199.167.194.101	274毫秒	46
郑州[联通]	199.167.194.101	402毫秒	44
上海[移动]	199.167.194.101	232毫秒	44
浙江[移动]	199.167.194.101	245毫秒	42
山东[联通]	199.167.194.101	371毫秒	44
辽宁[联通]	199.167.194.101	超时	—
泉州[电信]	199.167.194.101	261毫秒	46
福州[电信]	199.167.194.101	257毫秒	47
宁波[电信]	199.167.194.101	248毫秒	44
沈阳[电信]	199.167.194.101	516毫秒	43
合肥[电信]	199.167.194.101	252毫秒	45
乐山[电信]	199.167.194.101	267毫秒	46

最快：上海[移动] 232 毫秒最慢：沈阳[电信] 516 毫秒
电信平均： 287 毫秒联通平均： 386 毫秒

拉斯维加斯：

Ping的地点	响应IP	响应时间	TTL
襄阳[电信]	208.93.153.101	194毫秒	51
眉山[电信]	208.93.153.101	207毫秒	51
南宁[电信]	208.93.153.101	180毫秒	49
重庆[联通]	208.93.153.101	432毫秒	48
厦门[电信]	208.93.153.101	215毫秒	50
郑州[联通]	208.93.153.101	超时	—
上海[移动]	208.93.153.101	156毫秒	48
浙江[移动]	208.93.153.101	159毫秒	45
山东[联通]	208.93.153.101	超时	—
辽宁[联通]	208.93.153.101	超时	—
泉州[电信]	208.93.153.101	166毫秒	50
福州[电信]	208.93.153.101	200毫秒	51
宁波[电信]	208.93.153.101	172毫秒	48
沈阳[电信]	208.93.153.101	492毫秒	47
合肥[电信]	208.93.153.101	192毫秒	49
乐山[电信]	208.93.153.101	265毫秒	50

最快：上海[移动] 156 毫秒最慢：沈阳[电信] 492 毫秒
电信平均： 228 毫秒联通平均： 432 毫秒

纽约机房评测

~$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : AuthenticAMD
cpu family      : 16
model           : 9
model name      : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128
stepping        : 1
cpu MHz         : 2000.180
cache size      : 512 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 5
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt 3dnowext 3dnow up amd_dcm pni popcnt hypervisor cmp_legacy extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch nodeid_msr
bogomips        : 4000.36
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate

~$ dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.1247 s, 85.9 MB/s

~$ wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2011-10-03 14:24:40--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test'

100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 8.61M/s   in 12s     

2011-10-03 14:24:52 (8.67 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

~$ wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin
--2011-10-03 14:25:08--  ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin
           => `100mb.bin'
Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155
Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done.
==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600
==> PASV ... done.    ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.
Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)

100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.31M/s   in 45s     

2011-10-03 14:25:55 (2.24 MB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600]

~$ wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin
--2011-10-03 14:27:31--  ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin
           => `test.bin'
Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9
Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD not needed.
==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600
==> PASV ... done.    ==> RETR test.bin ... done.
Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)

100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.50M/s   in 42s     

2011-10-03 14:28:15 (2.36 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600]

UnixBench评分：

  #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

   Version 5.1.2                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA
   December 22, 2007                  johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: ***: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011
   Machine: i686 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6128 (4000.4 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, AMD MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   14:30:06 up 25 days,  4:03,  1 user,  load average: 0.22, 0.15, 0.06; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 14:30:06 - 14:58:01
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables        9321629.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1537.6 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1541.2 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        300124.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           87730.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        578670.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              569403.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  59794.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2665.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2577.6 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    332.1 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         646641.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0    9321629.6    798.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1537.6    279.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1541.2    358.4
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     300124.9    757.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      87730.8    530.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     578670.8    997.7
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     569403.4    457.7
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      59794.0    149.5
Process Creation                                126.0       2665.7    211.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2577.6    607.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        332.1    553.5
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     646641.8    431.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         449.1

拉斯维加斯机房评测

~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 26
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           E5506  @ 2.13GHz
stepping        : 5
cpu MHz         : 2133.468
cache size      : 4096 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 11
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 sep cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht nx constant_tsc up aperfmperf pni ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt hypervisor
bogomips        : 4266.93
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 40 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=16k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.96411 s, 67.7 MB/s

~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2011-10-03 16:45:28--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test'

100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 2.29M/s   in 44s     

2011-10-03 16:46:12 (2.27 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

~# wget ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin
--2011-10-03 16:48:50--  ftp://dl.solcon.nl/pub/test/100mb.bin
           => `100mb.bin'
Resolving dl.solcon.nl... 87.195.63.155
Connecting to dl.solcon.nl|87.195.63.155|:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD (1) /pub/test ... done.
==> SIZE 100mb.bin ... 104857600
==> PASV ... done.    ==> RETR 100mb.bin ... done.
Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)

100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600  330K/s   in 2m 50s  

2011-10-03 16:51:43 (604 KB/s) - `100mb.bin' saved [104857600]

~# wget ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin
--2011-10-03 16:54:12--  ftp://ftp.ovh.net/test.bin
           => `test.bin'
Resolving http://ftp.ovh.net... 213.186.33.9
Connecting to http://ftp.ovh.net|213.186.33.9|:21... connected.
Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in!
==> SYST ... done.    ==> PWD ... done.
==> TYPE I ... done.  ==> CWD not needed.
==> SIZE test.bin ... 104857600
==> PASV ... done.    ==> RETR test.bin ... done.
Length: 104857600 (100M) (unauthoritative)

100%[==========================================================================================>] 104,857,600 1.18M/s   in 98s

UnixBench评分；

2011-10-03 16:55:52 (1.02 MB/s) - `test.bin' saved [104857600]

   #    #  #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #
   #    #  ##   #  #   #  #           #    #  #       ##   #  #    #  #    #
   #    #  # #  #  #    ##            #####   #####   # #  #  #       ######
   #    #  #  # #  #    ##            #    #  #       #  # #  #       #    #
   #    #  #   ##  #   #  #           #    #  #       #   ##  #    #  #    #
    ####   #    #  #  #    #          #####   ######  #    #   ####   #    #

   Version 5.1.2                      Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

   Multi-CPU version                  Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
                                      Sunnyvale, CA, USA
   December 22, 2007                  johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks  1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation  1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead  1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)  1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)  1 2 3

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

   System: ***: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 04:40:25 UTC 2011
   Machine: i686 (unknown)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5506 @ 2.13GHz (4266.9 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT
   16:58:23 up  3:30,  1 user,  load average: 0.14, 0.03, 0.01; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Mon Oct 03 2011 16:58:23 - 17:26:17
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       12071752.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2183.7 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1695.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        309520.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           86403.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        844233.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              518445.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  65670.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3013.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3028.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    389.5 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         571007.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   12071752.2   1034.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2183.7    397.0
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1695.0    394.2
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     309520.8    781.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      86403.6    522.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     844233.3   1455.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     518445.3    416.8
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      65670.1    164.2
Process Creation                                126.0       3013.1    239.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3028.4    714.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        389.5    649.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     571007.8    380.7
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         505.4

多条评论

拉瑟说道：

2011年10月5日上午9:38

价格很吸引人，但联通的ping。。。

回复
1. 微魔说道：
  
  2011年10月5日下午6:05
  
  呵呵，联通最近经常抽风，ping这种事情要看时间点的~
  
  回复
大连阿尔滨说道：

2011年10月7日下午6:21

我正在用这家，老抽风，平均两个个星期肯定有一次大毛病（宕机超过10小时），唉，价钱是没得说

回复
1. 微魔说道：
  
  2011年10月7日下午11:06
  
  一分钱一分货吧，做站稳定性肯定有影响~
  
  回复
  1. 大连阿尔滨说道：
    
    2011年10月8日上午8:50
    
    博主大哥有没有比较少抽风的VPS推荐呀就放2个小站
    
    月10刀以内就行不胜感谢
    
    回复
    1. 微魔说道：
      
      2011年10月9日上午8:02
      
      呵呵，这个不好推荐，线路抽风没什么办法，天朝的原因。而且两个小站也要看具体的程序和访问量。
      
      回复
歌菲尔说道：

2011年10月11日下午8:41

价格还可以！就是不稳定！
中国最远的距离是网通和电信

回复
1. 微魔说道：
  
  2011年10月11日下午11:23
  
  是的~
  
  回复
森磊说道：

2011年10月14日上午10:34

可以把旺旺和QQ挂上去么

回复
1. 微魔说道：
  
  2011年10月14日下午6:12
  
  挂到哪里？
  
  回复
森磊说道：

2011年10月15日上午10:44

BuyVM年付15刀OpenVZ 挂到这个上可以么或者站长麻烦给推荐一款便宜的可以挂旺旺和QQ的

回复
1. 微魔说道：
  
  2011年10月17日下午4:39
  
  挂QQ和旺旺的话还是要Win的VPS吧，OpenVZ不可以装Win的，可以尝试buyVM的KVM系列或者关注本博客介绍得其他廉价Xen VPS
  
  回复

AlienVPS – 年付14美元 190MB 19G 190G 拉斯维加斯/纽约